MATERIALE
PRIMATOLOGICO PRESENTE IN RETE:
Primatological documents
on the web
CARE
AND USE OF ANIMALS | CARE AND USE OF PRIMATES
| ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT | PRIMATE
CONSERVATION | PRIMATE TRADE
CARE
AND USE OF ANIMALS
-
European
Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental
and other Scientific Purposes (Strasbourg, 18.III.1986)
The member States of the Council of Europe, signatory hereto,
-
Recalling that the aim of the Council of Europe is to achieve a greater
unity between its members and that it wishes to co-operate with other States
in the protection of live animals used for experimental and other scientific
purposes;
-
Recognising that man has a moral obligation to respect all animals and
to have due consideration for their capacity for suffering and memory;
-
Accepting nevertheless that man in his quest for knowledge, health and
safety has a need to use animals where there is a reasonable
-
expectation that the result will be to extend knowledge or be to the overall
benefit of man or animal, just as he uses them for food, clothing and as
beasts of burden;
-
Resolved to limit the use of animals for experimental and other scientific
purposes, with the aim of replacing such use wherever practical, in particular
by seeking alternative measures and encouraging the use of these alternative
measures;
-
Desirous to adopt common provisions in order to protect animals used in
those procedures which may possibly cause pain, suffering, distress or
lasting harm and to ensure that where unavoidable they shall be kept to
a minimum,
-
Have agreed as follows ......:
-
Guidelines for Ethical
Conduct in the Care and Use of Animals (American Psychological
Association's Committee on Animal Research and Ethics, CARE)
The guidelines were developed by the American Psychological Association
(APA) for use by psychologists working with nonhuman animals. They are
based on and are in conformity with Section 6.20 of the Ethical Principles
of Psychologists and Code of Conduct of APA. In the ordinary course of
events, the acquisition, care, housing, use, and disposition of animals
should be in compliance with applicable federal, state, local, and institutional
laws and regulations and with international conventions to which the United
States is a party. APA members working outside the United States are to
follow all applicable laws and regulations of the country in which they
conduct research.
-
Guide For The
Care And Use of Laboratory Animals (from ILAR)
A respected resource for decades, the Guide for the Care and Use
of Laboratory Animals has been revised by a committee of experts, based
on input from scientists and the public. The Guide incorporates recent
research on commonly used species, including farm animals, and includes
extensive references. It is organized around major components of animal
use: o Institutional policies and responsibilities. The committee discusses
areas that require policy attention: the role and function of the Institutional
Animal Care and Use Committee, protocols for animal care and use, occupational
health and safety, personnel qualifications, and other areas. o Animal
environment, husbandry, and management. The committee offers guidelines
on how to design and run a management program, addressing environment,
nutrition, sanitation, behavioral and social issues, genetics, nomenclature,
and more. o Veterinary care. The committee discusses animal procurement
and transportation, disease and preventive medicine, and surgery. The Guide
addresses pain recognition and relief and issues surrounding euthanasia.
o Physical plant. The committee identifies design and construction issues,
providing guidelines for animal-room doors, drainage, noise control, surgery,
and other areas. The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals provides
a framework for the judgments required in the management of animal facilities--a
resource of proven value, now updated and expanded. This revision will
be important to researchers, animal care technicians, facilities managers,
administrators at research institutions, policymakers involved in research
issues, and animal welfare advocates.
The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the
Governing Board of the National Research Council. whose members are drawn
from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences. National Academy
of Engineering. and Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee
responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and
with regard for appropriate balance.
This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors
according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting
of members of the National Academy of Sciences. National Academy of Engineering.
and Institute of Medicine.
This study was supported by the Comparative Medicine Program. National
Center for Research Resources the Interagency Research Animal Committee.
and the Office for Protection from Research Risks. National Institutes
of Health/Department of Health and Human Services; the U.S. Department
of Agriculture; and the Department of Veterans Affairs. The grant was awarded
by the Comparative Medicine Program. National Center for Research Resources.
and all agency funding was provided under grant NIH RR08779-02.
-
Recognition and Alleviation
of Pain and Distress in Laboratory Animals (1992)
NAP on line book
Clear guidelines on the proper care and use of laboratory animals
are being sought by researchers and members of the many committees formed
to oversee animal care at universities as well as the general public. This
book provides a comprehensive overview of what we know about behavior,
pain, and distress in laboratory animals. The volume explores:
Stressors in the laboratory and the animal behaviors they cause,
including in-depth discussions of the physiology of pain and distress and
the animal's ecological relationship to the laboratory as an environment.
A review of euthanasia of lab animals--exploring the decision, the methods,
and the emotional effects on technicians.
Also included is a highly practical, extensive listing, by species,
of dosages and side effects of anesthetics, analgesics, and tranquilizers.
-
Animal Welfare
Legislation and Policies (IPS)
-
Links about Animal Welfare Legislation and Guidelines to the Care and
Use of Research Animals
-
Animal Welfare Information
Center (U.S. Department of Agriculture)
-
Providing information for improved animal care and use in research,
teaching, and testing.
-
Essentials for
Animal Research
-
This manual was developed from the outlines of a course entitled Essentials
for Animal Research, originally developed at the University of Illinois
at Chicago for graduate students who wanted to learn more about the use
of animals in research than generally covered in the training received
in their chosen area of concentration. From its inception, the course
has constantly evolved to remain current with everchanging regulations
and an increasing awareness by graduate students of the issues concerning
the use of animals in biomedical research, teaching and testing.
The course introduces those elements which have become essential requirements
for using animals in research, teaching or testing programs. These requirements
primarily center around the responsibilities one assumes when they intend
to use animals in their work. The ultimate responsibility lies with
the Principle Investigator who must have a working knowledge of the regulations,
be familiar with the factors that affect the selection, acquisition and
maintenance of experimental animals and be aware of the ethical and social
issues involved with the use of animals in biomedical research.
-
Education
& Training in the Care & Use of Lab Animals
-
PHS policy requires that PHS-funded institutions file an Animal Welfare
Assurance that must include "a synopsis of training or instruction in the
humane practice of animal care and use, as well as training or instruction
in research or testing methods that minimize the number of animals required
to obtain valid results and minimize animal distress, offered to scientists,
animal technicians, and other personnel involved in animal care, treatment,
or use" (PHS, 1986, p. 4).
The Committee on Educational Programs in Laboratory Animal Science
(EPLAS) has prepared this guide to aid institutions in implementing an
education and training program that will meet the expectations of the PHS
Office for Protection from Research Risks (OPRR), which oversees the PHS
policy, and the Regulatory Enforcement and Animal Care (REAC) unit of the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
which regulates the Animal Welfare Act. This guide has been designed to
fulfill several purposes. First, it is intended to assist institutional
officials and institutional animal care and use committees (IACUCs) in
determining the scope and depth of education and training programs that
will meet both institutional needs and the requirements of the OPRR and
REAC. Second, it is offered as a reference for the person or committee
assigned the responsibility for coordinating these programs. Finally, portions
of the guide will be useful to those people (content experts) who develop
the material to be presented.
-
Good Laboratory
Practice Standards
-
New
Zeland National Animal Ethics Advisory Committee 1998 Annual Report
-
1999: Second
report on the statistics on the number of animals used for experimental
and other scientific purposes in the member states of the European Union
- IT
-
The use of laboratory animals is a matter of great public concern. In
the European Union there is a general need and commitment to reduce the
number of animals used in laboratories for experimental and other scientific
purposes to the minimum level which is scientifically necessary.
Recent statistics which provide information on how and where animals
are currently used for experimental purposes are now available in the European
Union. These statistics are contained in the Second Report from the European
Commission [COM(1999)191final] following its
adoption by the Commission on 26 April 1999.
- These statistics are important because they enable us to monitor
whether the aim of reducing the use of laboratory animals is achieved.
Reliable statistics also serve as a good basis for constructive discussion
on how reductions can be achieved and assist in analysing the effects of
the introduction of new alternative methods.
- This Second Report provides a comprehensive overview on the number
of animals used in the European Union in 1996. It also provides some insight
as to the species and purposes these animals were used for. In spite of
the fact that the Report is based on non-uniform data, some
conclusions can be drawn from the data. These are reported
in section 3 of the Report. Section 4 details the raw data as provided
by each Member State.
-
2003: Third
statistical report on the use of laboratory animals in the EU - IT
- 22/1/03
-
The use of laboratory animals is a matter of great public concern. In
the European Union there is a general need and commitment to reduce the
number of animals used in laboratories for experimental and other scientific
purposes to the minimum level, which is scientifically necessary.
- Recent statistics, which provide information on how and where
animals are used for experimental purposes, are now available in the European
Union. These statistics are contained in the Third Report from the European
Commission [COM(2003 19 final] following its adoption by the Commission
on 22 January 2003.
- These statistics are important because they enable us to monitor
whether the aim of reducing the use of laboratory animals is achieved.
Reliable statistics also serve as a good basis for constructive discussion
on how further reductions can be achieved and assist in analysing the effects
of the introduction of new alternative methods.
- The Third Report provides a comprehensive overview on the number
of animals used in the EU in 1999 for experimental and other scientific
purposes. It covers a much wider range of procedures and purposes than
previous reports. The purposes of experiments are now described in more
detail, including aspects such as regulatory requirements and types of
tests versus products tested. This allows one to draw a much more precise
and comprehensive picture at the EU level, which is presented in part A
of the Report. Part B details the raw data as provided by each Member State
accompanied by respective national comments.
-
2003: Guidelines
for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching (ANIMAL
BEHAVIOUR, 2003, 65, 249–255)
-
Behavioural studies are of great importance in increasing our understanding
and appreciation of animals. In addition to providing knowledge about the
diversity and complexity of behaviour in nature, such studies also provide
information crucial to improvements in the wel-fare of animals maintained
in laboratories, agricultural settings and zoos, and as companion animals.
The use of animals in behavioural research and teaching does, however,
raise important ethical issues. While many behavioural studies are noninvasive
and involve only observations of animals in their natural habitat, some
research questions cannot be addressed without manipu-lation of animals.
Studies of captive animals necessarily involve keeping animals in confinement,
and manipula-tive procedures and surgery may be necessary to achieve the
aims of the research. Studies of free-living animals in their natural habitats
can cause disruption, particularly if feeding, capture, marking or experimental
procedures are involved.
To help the members make what are sometimes difficult ethical judgements
about the procedures involved in the study of animals, the Association
for the Study of Animal Behaviour and the Animal Behavior Society
have formed Ethical and Animal Care committees, respectively. These committees
jointly produced the following guidelines for the use of all those who
are engaged in behavioural research and teaching activities involving vertebrate
and invertebrate animals. These guidelines are general in scope, since
the diversity of species and the study techniques used in behavioural research
precludes the inclusion of prescriptive standards for animal care and treatment.
CARE AND USE OF PRIMATES
The
Psychological Well-Being of Nonhuman Primates (1998)
NAP on line book
Chimpanzees
in Research: Strategies for Their Ethical Care, Management, and Use
(1997) [BOOK]
The project that is the subject of this report was approved by
the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are
drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy
of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee
responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and
with regard for appropriate balance.
This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors
according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting
of members of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering,
and Institute of Medicine.
This study was supported under contract NO1-OD-4-2139, T.O. 17,
from the National Institutes of Health. Core support is provided to the
Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources by the Comparative Medicine Program,
National Center for Research Resources, through grant 5P40RR0137; by the
National Science Foundation through grant BIR-9024967; by the US Army Medical
Research and Development Command, which serves as the lead agency for combined
US Department of Defense funding, also received from the Human Systems
Division of the US Air Force Systems Command, Armed Forces Radiobiology
Research Institute, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences,
and US Naval Medical Research and Development Command, through grant DAMD17-93-J-3016;
and by research project grant RC-1-34 from the American Cancer Society.
Recommendations include a five-year breeding moratorium; that euthanasia
should _not_ be endorsed as a general means of population control; that
a core population of about 1000 chimpanzees should be assured lifetime
support by the federal government, and that ownership of these animals
should be transferred to the government; that the concept of sanctuaries
for the long-term care and well-being of "surplus" chimpanzees should be
an integral component of any plan; that a single multiagency organizational
unit should be established and given direct responsibility for government-owned
animals that are considered necessary to meet current and long-term national
needs; and that an appropriate advisory council of nongovernment experts
should be created for the purpose of establishing policies and monitoring
them.
Diskussion-paper on cage
sizes for primates (EUPREN)
Housing of laboratory animals is to be considered at the December 1996
Multilateral Consultation of Parties to the European Convention for the
Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific
Purposes. Although the number of non-human primates used for such purposes
is relatively small, the issues which need to be addressed in the
discussion of their housing are particularly complex. There is, for example,
a great diversity ofmorphological, physiological, psychological and social
requirements for the different species of non-human primates used in research.
The present paper has been prepared by EUPREN in advance of this Multilateral
Consultation, in order to highlight the key issues which need to be considered
in any discussion of housing for non-human primates. Over the next 3 months,
a range of interested parties will be invited to comment (Annex 1).
It is clear that altering the detail of
the European legislation on cage requirements could have wide-ranging implications.
While such alterations offer considerable potential to enhance animal wellbeing,
the financial investment required may lead to research being relocated
to countries where welfare standards and control are less favourable than
in Europe. It is therefore of critical importance to ensure that the legislative
guidelines are based upon firm scientific foundations.
Many pre-existing guidelines are somewhat
subjective in that they have been formulated on the basis of current practice,
economic considerations and good intent. Relatively recent developments
in remote and non-invasive monitoring enable the impact of different housing
conditions to be assessed more objectively. The underpinning technologies
and approaches for such studies were discussed at a EUPREN/EMRG Meeting
on "The Implications of Non-invasive and Remote Monitoring Techniques for
Non-human primate Research and Husbandry" (December 1995, Gottingen).
In view of the paucity of fundamental scientific
information, there is an urgent need to collate available data, draw up
a list of questions which need to be asked and agree upon the collaborative
programmes which are required to provide the answers to these questions.
The progress of and recommendations which
emerge from this document will be presented during the second EUPREN/EMRG
Winter Workshop "The
implications of housing and husbandry for scientific quality and wellbeing",
Rome (25-27 November, 1996).
The Implications
of Housing and Husbandry for Scientific Quality and Well-Being of Non-Human
Primates, Rome 25-27.09.1996
(71K)
Housing of laboratory animals is to be considered at the May 1997
Multilateral Consultation of Parties to the European Convention for the
Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific
Purposes. Although the number of non-human primates used for such purposes
is relatively small, the issues which need to be addressed in the discussion
of their housing are particularly complex. There is, for example, a great
diversity of morphological, physiological, psychological and social requirements
for the different species of non-human primates used in research. The present
paper has been prepared by EUPREN in advance of this Multilateral Consultation,
in order to highlight the key issues which need to be considered in any
discussion of housing for non-human primates. It is clear that altering
the detail of the European legislation on cage requirements could have
wide-ranging implications. While such alterations offer considerable potential
to enhance animal well-being, the financial investment required may lead
to research being relocated to countries where welfare standards and control
are less favourable than in Europe. It is therefore of critical importance
to ensure that the legislative guidelines are based upon firm scientific
foundations. Many pre-existing guidelines are somewhat subjective
in that they have been formulated on the basis of current practice, economic
considerations and good intent. Relatively recent developments in remote
and non-invasive monitoring enable the impact of different housing conditions
to be assessed more objectively. The underpinning technologies and approaches
for such studies were discussed at a EUPREN/EMRG Meeting on "The Implications
of Non-invasive and Remote Monitoring Techniques for Non-human Primate
Research and Husbandry" (December 1995, Göttingen). In view
of the paucity of fundamental scientific information, there is an urgent
need to collate available data, draw up a list of questions which need
to be asked and agree upon the collaborative programmes which are required
to provide the answers to these questions.
Implications of Non-Invasive
& Remote Monitoring Techniques for Non-Human Primate Research and Husbandry
(EUPREN dec 1995)
The following are the abstracts of papers and posters presented
at a joint EUPREN/EMRG meeting held at DPZ in Göttingen (6-8 December,
1995).
Recent advances in remote and non-invasive monitoring technologies
offer considerable potential for refining studies involving non-human primates,
both in terms of animal welfare and scientific quality. The range of speakers
and delegates from diverse scientific backgrounds facilitated invaluable
multidisciplinary information exchange. Proceedings of the meeting will
be published and a follow-up is planned for November, 1996.
Arguments
for Single-Caging of Rhesus Macaques: Are They Justified?
Human primates are social by nature and strive best in the supportive
environment of compatible conspecifics. Being forcefully deprived of companionship
is therefore one of the most dreaded punishments. Nonhuman primates share
the same basic "social needs" (36) as human primates do, and sociality
is central to their very survival x(2). Like human primates, nonhuman primates
may become mentally disturbed when chronically kept in social isolation,
and they often express their distress in abnormal behavior patterns (cf.
6).
Comparing
Cage Space Requirements for Nonhuman Primates in the United States and
in Europe
Fifty-six investigators working closely with laboratory nonhuman primates
were asked what they thought could be done to the home environment to improve
their animals' well-being (1). The most frequent of 28 suggested recommendations
was for larger cages (6). A comparison of cage space requirements in the
United States (5, 10) with those in Europe (3) supports this recommendation.
Table 1 lists the respective stipulations for animals up to 25 kilograms
(kg) (Animals over 25 kg are
considered only in the U.S. rules.).
Lighting
Conditions For Laboratory Monkeys: Are They Accurate?
Research laboratories generally keep nonhuman primates and other research
animals under strictly controlled light/dark rhythms to avoid variability
of research data because photoperiod (daily exposure to light) profoundly
affects animals. Light intensity (illumination), however, has been given
relatively little consideration in the scientific literature and consequently
has been widely overlooked as an environmental factor possibly affecting,
in undesired ways, the well-being of research subjects and the data collected
from them.ù
NIH NONHUMAN
PRIMATE MANAGEMENT PLAN (1991)
The director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) requested
in March 1987, "state-of-the-art" housing for the nonhuman primate population
at NIH. As a result of this, the National Center for Research Resources
(NCRR) hired Dr. Kathryn Bayne to coordinate the development of this document,
conduct a survey of nonhuman primate utilization and conduct independent
research on environmental enrichment. She was also directed to work with
scientists and veterinarians working with nonhuman primates, the Office
of Animal Care and Use (OACU), and the Veterinary Resources Program (VRP)
in the formulation of this plan. The document, then, presents the results
of the survey and recommendations of a diverse group of researchers, care
providers and administrators to meet the 1985 congressional mandate for
improved "psychological well-being" of nonhuman primates. This Plan does
not attempt to set the standard for nonhuman primate housing across the
country, but rather is a research oriented program through which various
means of environmental enrichment can be tested and implemented at NIH.
The welfare
of non-human primates used in research. Report of the Scientific
Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare. Adopted on 17 December 2002
ENVIRONMENTAL
ENRICHMENT
Environmental
Enrichment Information Resources 1987/1992 for Nonhuman Primates
This document supercedes Information Resources for Environmental Enrichment
of Primates: 1987-1990 published in March of 1991.-- Produced in cooperation
with the National Library of Medicine (NLM), Primate Information Center
(PIC), and the Office for Protection from Research Risks (OPRR), the updated
edition is more comprehensive and has been peer-reviewed.
Environmental
Enrichment for Nonhuman Primates Resource Guide (Jan 92 - Feb 99 AWIC
Resources Series No. 5, March 1999 - Editor:
Michael D. Kreger, M.S. Animal Welfare Information Center USDA, ARS, NAL
10301 Baltimore Avenue Beltsville, MD 20705-2351)
Uscito nel marzo 1999, questo volume curato dall'AWIC (Animal Welfare
Information Center), disponibile integralmente in rete, fornisce un'impressionante
collezione aggiornata di bibliogafie, testi, informazioni e
links sull'Environmental Enrichment e il Welfar dei Primati in cattività.
Occorre considerare che si fa riferimento solo alla legislazione USA. Ci
sono anche links ad alcuni articoli:
Using
Training to Enhance Animal Care and Welfare Gail Laule (1993)
The Use
of Behavioral Management Techniques to Reduce or Eliminate Abnormal Behavior
Gail Laule (1993)
Environmental
Enrichment for Captive Wildlife Through the Simulation of Gum Feeding
Kathy Kelly (1993)
Arguments
for Single-Caging of Rhesus Macaques: Are They Justified?
Frequently
Asked Questions About Safe Pair-housing of Macaques
Viktor Reinhardt (1996)
The
Wisconsin Gnawing Stick Viktor Reinhardt (1997)
Il documento si conclude con l'USDA
Final Rule on Environment Enhancement to Promote Psychological Well-Being
PRIMATE
CONSERVATION
-
2000: CITES:
a conservation tool
-
The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild
Fauna and Flora (CITES) was concluded in 1973 and entered into force on
1 July, 1975. It now counts 145 countries as Parties, or member states
(as of 31 March 1999). The treaty was developed in response to concerns
about the potential detrimental effects on species' survival of high levels
of international trade in wild animals and plants. It establishes the international
legal framework for the prevention of trade in endangered species and for
an effective regulation of trade in certain other species.
-
The treaty's fundamental principles govern the species to be listed
in the various Appendices on the basis of the different levels of threat
posed by international trade and detail appropriate levels of trade regulation.
The four Appendices to the Convention form the basis for implementation
of the treaty. Appendices, I, II, and III establish different levels of
trade restriction for species listed on each of these three Appendices.
Appendix IV makes provision for the issue of permits which are required
before international trade in the species listed on Appendices I, II or
III can occur.
-
25
Species of Primates Endangered (Conservation International) --
-
Not one species of primates has been lost in the past century, but now
25 species of apes, monkeys, lemurs and other primates are imperiled and
may soon disappear, experts warned Monday. "As we enter the new millennium,
we risk losing our closest living relatives in the animal kingdom," said
Russell Mittermeier, president of Conservation International.
The most endangered primates, according to the study, include the golden
bamboo lemur in Madagascar, the yellow-tailed woolly monkey in the tropical
Andes, the mountain gorilla in central Africa and the Tonkin snub-nosed
monkey of Vietnam.
Other primates on the 25-most-imperiled list are: The Lac
Alaotra bamboo lemur, the Perrier's sifaka, the silky sifaka and the golden-crowned
sifaka, all in Madagascar and the Indian Ocean islands; the golden
lion tamarin, the black lion tamarin, the black-faced lion tamarin, the
buff-headed capuchin and the northern muriqui, all in Brazil; the Miss
Waldron's red colobus, white-naped mangabey, Sclater's guenon, the drill
gorilla, and the cross-river gorilla, all in West Africa; the sanje mangabey
in Kenya and Tanzania; the Delacour's langur, Cat Ba Island golden-headed
langur and the gray-shanked douc langur, all in Vietnam; the Hainan gibbon
in China; and the Sumatran orangutan and the Javan gibbon, both in Indonesia.
Hotspot
website.
-
2000: IUCN
Guidelines for the placement of confiscated animals
-
Live wild animals are confiscated by local, regional, and national authorities
for a variety of reasons. Once they have taken possession of these animals,
these authorities must dispose of them responsibly, in a timely and efficient
manner. Prevailing legislation, cultural practices, and economic conditions
will influence decisions on appropriate disposition of confiscated animals.
Within a conservation context, there are several possible options from
which to choose:
1) to maintain the animals in captivity for the remainder of their
natural lives;
2) to return the animals to the wild;
3) to euthanize the animals, i.e., humanely destroy them
The IUCN Guidelines for the Placement of Confiscated Animals discuss
the benefits and risks involved in each of these options. These Guidelines
should be read in conjunction with the IUCN Guidelines for Re-introductions
(IUCN 1998). They should also be read with reference to the CITES Guidelines
for the Disposal of Confiscated Live Species of Species Included in the
Appendices (Resolution Conf. 10.7) and the IUCN Guidelines for the Prevention
of Biodiversity Loss Caused by Alien Invasive Species.
-
1995: IUCN
Guidelines for reintroductions
-
These policy guidelines have been drafted by the Re-introduction Specialist
Group of the IUCN's Species Survival Commission (1), in response to the
increasing occurrence of re-introduction projects worldwide, and consequently,
to the growing need for specific policy guidelines to help ensure that
the re-introductions achieve their intended conservation benefit, and do
not cause adverse side-effects of greater impact. Although IUCN developed
a Position Statement on the Translocation of Living Organisms in 1987,
more detailed guidelines were felt to be essential in providing more comprehensive
coverage of the various factors involved in re-introduction exercises.
These guidelines are intended to act as a guide for procedures useful
to re-introduction programmes and do not represent an inflexible code of
conduct. Many of the points are more relevant to re-introductions using
captive-bred individuals than to translocations of wild species. Others
are especially relevant to globally endangered species with limited numbers
of founders. Each re-introduction proposal should be rigorously reviewed
on its individual merits. It should be noted that re-introduction is always
a very lengthy, complex and expensive process.
Re-introductions or translocations of species for short-term, sporting
or commercial purposes - where there is no intention to establish a viable
population - are a different issue and beyond the scope of these guidelines.
These include fishing and hunting activities.
-
2000: IUCN
Guidelines for the Prevention of Biodiversity Loss due to Biological Invasion
-
Biological diversity faces many threats throughout the world. One of
the major threats to native biological diversity is now acknowledged by
scientists and governments to be biological invasions caused by alien invasive
species. The impacts of alien invasive species are immense, insidious,
and usually irreversible. They may be as damaging to native species and
ecosystems on a global scale as the loss and degradation of habitats.
For millennia, the natural barriers of oceans, mountains, rivers
and deserts provided the isolation essential for unique species and ecosystems
to evolve. In just a few hundred years these barriers have been rendered
ineffective by major global forces that combined to help alien species
travel vast distances to new habitats and become alien invasive species.
The globalisation and growth in the volume of trade and tourism, coupled
with the emphasis on free trade, provide more opportunities than ever before
for species to be spread accidentally or deliberately. Customs and quarantine
practices, developed in an earlier time to guard against human and economic
diseases and pests, are often inadequate safeguards against species that
threaten native biodiversity. Thus the inadvertent ending of millions of
years of biological isolation has created major ongoing problems that affect
developed and developing countries.
The scope and cost of biological alien invasions is global and enormous,
in both ecological and economic terms. Alien invasive species are found
in all taxonomic groups: they include introduced viruses, fungi, algae,
mosses, ferns, higher plants, invertebrates, fish, amphibians, reptiles,
birds and mammals. They have invaded and affected native biota in virtually
every ecosystem type on Earth. Hundreds of extinctions have been caused
by alien invasives. The ecological cost is the irretrievable loss of native
species and ecosystems.
PRIMATE
TRADE