MATERIALE PRIMATOLOGICO PRESENTE IN RETE:
Primatological documents on the web

CARE AND USE OF ANIMALS | CARE AND USE OF PRIMATES | ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT | PRIMATE CONSERVATION | PRIMATE TRADE

CARE AND USE OF ANIMALS


CARE AND USE OF PRIMATES

  • The Psychological Well-Being of Nonhuman Primates (1998)
  • NAP on line book
  • Chimpanzees in Research: Strategies for Their Ethical Care, Management, and Use (1997) [BOOK]
  • The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.
    This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine.
    This study was supported under contract NO1-OD-4-2139, T.O. 17, from the National Institutes of Health. Core support is provided to the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources by the Comparative Medicine Program, National Center for Research Resources, through grant 5P40RR0137; by the National Science Foundation through grant BIR-9024967; by the US Army Medical Research and Development Command, which serves as the lead agency for combined US Department of Defense funding, also received from the Human Systems Division of the US Air Force Systems Command, Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, and US Naval Medical Research and Development Command, through grant DAMD17-93-J-3016; and by research project grant RC-1-34 from the American Cancer Society.
    Recommendations include a five-year breeding moratorium; that euthanasia should _not_ be endorsed as a general means of population control; that a core population of about 1000 chimpanzees should be assured lifetime support by the federal government, and that ownership of these animals should be transferred to the government; that the concept of sanctuaries for the long-term care and well-being of "surplus" chimpanzees should be an integral component of any plan; that a single multiagency organizational unit should be established and given direct responsibility for government-owned animals that are considered necessary to meet current and long-term national needs; and that an appropriate advisory council of nongovernment experts should be created for the purpose of establishing policies and monitoring them.
  • Diskussion-paper on cage sizes for primates (EUPREN)
  • Housing of laboratory animals is to be considered at the December 1996 Multilateral Consultation of Parties to the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes. Although the number of non-human primates used for such purposes is relatively small, the issues which need to  be addressed in the discussion of their housing are particularly complex. There is, for example, a great diversity ofmorphological, physiological, psychological and social requirements for the different species of non-human primates used in research. The present paper has been prepared by EUPREN in advance of this Multilateral Consultation, in order to highlight the key issues which need to be considered in any discussion of housing for non-human primates. Over the next 3 months, a range of interested parties will be invited to comment (Annex 1).

  •      It is clear that altering the detail of the European legislation on cage requirements could have wide-ranging implications. While such alterations offer considerable potential to enhance animal wellbeing, the financial investment required may lead to research being relocated to countries where welfare standards and control are less favourable than in Europe. It is therefore of critical importance to ensure that the legislative guidelines are based upon firm scientific foundations.
         Many pre-existing guidelines are somewhat subjective in that they have been formulated on the basis of current practice, economic considerations and good intent. Relatively recent developments in remote and non-invasive monitoring enable the impact of different housing conditions to be assessed more objectively. The underpinning technologies and approaches for such studies were discussed at a EUPREN/EMRG Meeting on "The Implications of Non-invasive and Remote Monitoring Techniques for Non-human primate Research and Husbandry" (December 1995, Gottingen).
         In view of the paucity of fundamental scientific information, there is an urgent need to collate available data, draw up a list of questions which need to be asked and agree upon the collaborative programmes which are required to provide the answers to these questions.
         The progress of and recommendations which emerge from this document will be presented during the second EUPREN/EMRG Winter Workshop "The implications of housing and husbandry for scientific quality and wellbeing", Rome (25-27 November, 1996).
  • The Implications of Housing and Husbandry for Scientific Quality and Well-Being of Non-Human Primates, Rome 25-27.09.1996 (71K)
  • Housing of laboratory animals is to be considered at the May 1997 Multilateral Consultation of Parties to the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes. Although the number of non-human primates used for such purposes is relatively small, the issues which need to be addressed in the discussion of their housing are particularly complex. There is, for example, a great diversity of morphological, physiological, psychological and social requirements for the different species of non-human primates used in research. The present paper has been prepared by EUPREN in advance of this Multilateral Consultation, in order to highlight the key issues which need to be considered in any discussion of housing for non-human primates.  It is clear that altering the detail of the European legislation on cage requirements could have wide-ranging implications. While such alterations offer considerable potential to enhance animal well-being, the financial investment required may lead to research being relocated to countries where welfare standards and control are less favourable than in Europe. It is therefore of critical importance to ensure that the legislative guidelines are based upon firm scientific foundations.  Many pre-existing guidelines are somewhat subjective in that they have been formulated on the basis of current practice, economic considerations and good intent. Relatively recent developments in remote and non-invasive monitoring enable the impact of different housing conditions to be assessed more objectively. The underpinning technologies and approaches for such studies were discussed at a EUPREN/EMRG Meeting on "The Implications of Non-invasive and Remote Monitoring Techniques for Non-human Primate Research and Husbandry" (December 1995, Göttingen).  In view of the paucity of fundamental scientific information, there is an urgent need to collate available data, draw up a list of questions which need to be asked and agree upon the collaborative programmes which are required to provide the answers to these questions.
  • Implications of Non-Invasive & Remote Monitoring Techniques for Non-Human Primate Research and Husbandry (EUPREN dec 1995)
  • The following are the abstracts of papers and posters presented at a joint EUPREN/EMRG meeting held at DPZ in Göttingen (6-8 December, 1995).
    Recent advances in remote and non-invasive monitoring technologies offer considerable potential for refining studies involving non-human primates, both in terms of animal welfare and scientific quality. The range of speakers and delegates from diverse scientific backgrounds facilitated invaluable multidisciplinary information exchange. Proceedings of the meeting will be published and a follow-up is planned for November, 1996.
  • Arguments for Single-Caging of Rhesus Macaques: Are They Justified?
  • Human primates are social by nature and strive best in the supportive environment of compatible conspecifics. Being forcefully deprived of companionship is therefore one of the most dreaded punishments. Nonhuman primates share the same basic "social needs" (36) as human primates do, and sociality is central to their very survival x(2). Like human primates, nonhuman primates may become mentally disturbed when chronically kept in social isolation, and they often express their distress in abnormal behavior patterns (cf. 6).
  • Comparing Cage Space Requirements for Nonhuman Primates in the United States and in Europe
  • Fifty-six investigators working closely with laboratory nonhuman primates were asked what they thought could be done to the home environment to improve their animals' well-being (1). The most frequent of 28 suggested recommendations was for larger cages (6). A comparison of cage space requirements in the United States (5, 10) with those in Europe (3) supports this recommendation. Table 1 lists the respective stipulations for animals up to 25 kilograms (kg) (Animals over 25 kg are

  • considered only in the U.S. rules.).
  • Lighting Conditions For Laboratory Monkeys: Are They Accurate?
  • Research laboratories generally keep nonhuman primates and other research animals under strictly controlled light/dark rhythms to avoid variability of research data because photoperiod (daily exposure to light) profoundly affects animals. Light intensity (illumination), however, has been given relatively little consideration in the scientific literature and consequently has been widely overlooked as an environmental factor possibly affecting, in undesired ways, the well-being of research subjects and the data collected from them.ù
  • NIH NONHUMAN PRIMATE MANAGEMENT PLAN (1991)
  • The welfare of non-human primates used in research. Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare. Adopted on 17 December 2002

  • ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT

  • Environmental Enrichment Information Resources 1987/1992 for Nonhuman Primates
  • This document supercedes Information Resources for Environmental Enrichment of Primates: 1987-1990 published in March of 1991.-- Produced in cooperation with the National Library of Medicine (NLM), Primate Information Center (PIC), and the Office for Protection from Research Risks (OPRR), the updated edition is more comprehensive and has been peer-reviewed.
  • Environmental Enrichment for Nonhuman Primates Resource Guide (Jan 92 - Feb 99 AWIC Resources Series No. 5, March 1999 - Editor: Michael D. Kreger, M.S. Animal Welfare Information Center USDA, ARS, NAL 10301 Baltimore Avenue Beltsville, MD 20705-2351)
  • Uscito nel marzo 1999, questo volume curato dall'AWIC (Animal Welfare Information Center), disponibile integralmente in rete, fornisce un'impressionante collezione aggiornata di bibliogafie,  testi,  informazioni e links sull'Environmental Enrichment e il Welfar dei Primati in cattività. Occorre considerare che si fa riferimento solo alla legislazione USA. Ci sono anche links ad alcuni articoli:
  • Using Training to Enhance Animal Care and Welfare Gail Laule (1993)
  • The Use of Behavioral Management Techniques to Reduce or Eliminate Abnormal Behavior

  • Gail Laule (1993)
  • Environmental Enrichment for Captive Wildlife Through the Simulation of Gum Feeding

  • Kathy Kelly (1993)
  • Arguments for Single-Caging of Rhesus Macaques: Are They Justified?
  • Frequently Asked Questions About Safe Pair-housing of Macaques

  • Viktor Reinhardt (1996)
  • The Wisconsin Gnawing Stick Viktor Reinhardt (1997)
  • Il documento si conclude con l'USDA Final Rule on Environment Enhancement to Promote Psychological Well-Being

  • PRIMATE CONSERVATION



    PRIMATE TRADE